Functional evaluation of a novel fibreglass-reinforced polyamide custom dynamic AFO for foot drop patients: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are orthopaedic devices often prescribed to treat foot drop. For patients who are not satisfied with off-the-shelf solutions, custom AFOs personalized to the patient's lower limb anatomy are required. Dynamic AFOs provide stability while allowing for physiological ankle mobility in the stance phase of walking. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can a morphology-based dynamic custom AFO made of fiberglass-reinforced polyamide restore a quasi-normal gait pattern and improve comfort in patients with foot drop? METHODS: In this pilot study, the legs and feet of ten foot drop patients (age=64.9 ± 11.4 years; BMI=26.2 ± 2.1 kg/m2) were scanned using a Kinect-based 3D scanner. A custom AFO was designed and produced for each patient using a fiberglass-reinforced polyamide through selective laser sintering. To assess kinematics, skin markers were placed on relevant bony landmarks according to a validated protocol. Each patient was instructed to walk at a self-selected comfortable speed under three conditions: wearing the custom AFO, wearing an off-the-shelf orthosis (Codivilla spring), and without any AFO (shod condition). Muscle activation in the tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius, rectus femoris and biceps femoris muscles in both legs was recorded using wireless sEMG sensors. The comfort and of each AFO was evaluated using a Visual Analogue Scale. RESULTS: The custom AFO resulted in significant increase of stride length and walking speed compared to the shod condition. Except for the hip joint, which exhibited greater maximum flexion and reduced range of motion, the kinematic parameters of all other joints were similar to those observed in a healthy control population. Furthermore, the custom AFO received significantly higher comfort scores compared to the Codivilla spring. SIGNIFICANCE: This study has provided evidence supporting the effectiveness of custom orthotic solutions in restoring lower limb kinematics and improving the perceived comfort in foot drop patients compared to off-the-shelf solutions.

Total knee arthroplasty in valgus knee deformity: is it still a challenge in 2021?

Total knee arthroplasty in valgus knee deformities continues to be a challenge for a surgeon. Approximately 10% of patients who undergo total knee arthroplasty have a valgus deformity. While performing total knee arthroplasty in a severe valgus knee, one should aware with the technical aspects of surgical exposure, bone cuts of the distal femur and proximal tibia, medial and lateral ligament balancing, flexion and extension gap balancing, creating an appropriate tibiofemoral joint line, balancing the patellofemoral joint, preserving peroneal nerve function, and selection of the implant regarding constraint. Restoration of neutral mechanical axis and correct ligament balance are important factors for stability and longevity of the prosthesis and for good functional outcome. Thus, our review aims to provide step by step comprehensive knowledge about different surgical techniques for the correction of severe valgus deformity in total knee arthroplasty.

Functional and clinical evaluation at 5-year follow-up of a three-component prosthesis and osteochondral allograft transplantation for total ankle replacement.

BACKGROUND: Severe ankle arthritis is a life-limiting condition which often requires surgery. Ankle arthroplasty via artificial or "biological" reconstruction is a viable option in those patients who are not comfortable with arthrodesis. More functional studies are needed to compare the performance and outcomes of the two function-preserving arthroplasties. METHODS: In this study two groups of 10 patients affected by severe ankle arthritis were treated either with a 3-component ankle prosthesis or with bipolar fresh osteochondral allograft transplantation. Patients were evaluated pre-operatively and at 5-year follow-up. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score was used for clinical evaluation, and gait analysis for functional assessment. Activation pattern of lower limb muscles was obtained by surface electromyography (EMG). In each group, kinematic, kinetic, and EMG data were compared between pre-op and follow-up assessments, and also versus corresponding data from a 20 healthy subject control group. The median clinical score significantly increased between pre-op and follow-up from 53 to 74.5 in the transplantation and from 28.5 to 80 in the prosthesis group. Spatio-temporal parameters showed a statistically significant improvement in cadence and cycle time. Improvement of gait speed was also observed only in the prosthesis group. EMG patterns at follow-up were strongly correlated with the corresponding control data for both groups. Although no significant amelioration in the joints' range of motion was detected in either surgical procedure, preservation of the functional conditions at medium-term, along with significant improvement of the clinical score, may be considered a positive outcome for both techniques.

Functional evaluation of patients treated with osteochondral allograft transplantation for post-traumatic ankle arthritis: one year follow-up.

Severe post-traumatic ankle arthritis poses a reconstructive challenge in active patients. Whereas traditional surgical treatments, i.e. arthrodesis and arthroplasty, provide good pain relief, arthrodesis is associated to functional and psychological limitations, and arthroplasty is prone to failure in the active patient. More recently the use of bipolar fresh osteochondral allografts transplantation has been proposed as a promising alternative to the traditional treatments. Preliminary short- and long-term clinical outcomes for this procedure have been reported, but no functional evaluations have been performed to date. The clinical and functional outcomes of a series of 10 patients who underwent allograft transplantation at a mean follow-up of 14 months are reported. Clinical evaluation was performed with the AOFAS score, functional assessment by state-of-the-art gait analysis. The clinical score significantly improved from a median of 54 (range 12-65) pre-op to 76.5 (range 61-86) post-op (p=0.002). No significant changes were observed for the spatial-temporal parameters, but motion at the hip and knee joints during early stance, and the range of motion of the ankle joint in the frontal plane (control: 13.8°±2.9°; pre-op: 10.4°±3.1°, post-op: 12.9°±4.2°; p=0.02) showed significant improvements. EMG signals revealed a good recovery in activation of the biceps femoris. This study showed that osteochondral allograft transplantation improves gait patterns. Although re-evaluation at longer follow-ups is required, this technique may represent the right choice for patients who want to delay the need for more invasive joint reconstruction procedures.